N.C. Initiative to Nix Domestic Partnerships Set for May 8 Vote
Peter DelVecchio

North Carolina voters will decide on May 8 whether to add to their state constitution an anti-gay amendment so radical it would put California’s Prop. 8 in the shade.

Amendment One provides that “marriage between one man and one woman is the only domestic legal union that shall be valid or recognized in this state.” Unlike anti-same-sex marriage measures that have been passed in many other states, most of which leave the door open to civil unions and domestic partnerships, the North Carolina measure appears to prohibit any governmental recognition of any kind of same-sex relationship. N.C. currently bars same-sex marriage by statute, but is the only state in the Southeast without an anti-gay marriage provision in its constitution.

The measure could also strip children of unmarried parents of health coverage, interfere with unmarried couples’ hospital visitation rights and emergency medical decisions, abolish domestic violence protections and harm seniors, according to Protect All North Carolina Families, a coalition organized to fight Amendment One.

Currently, 56 percent of North Carolina voters support the measure, with only 34 percent opposed, according to a January survey by Public Policy Polling, the Charlotte Observer reported Feb. 29.

Tony Perkins, President of the Family Research Council, an organization labeled a “hate group” by the Southern Poverty Law Center, says prospects for the amendment look “very, very favorable.”

But public opinion might be changing. “North Carolinians are increasingly having doubts” about the proposed amendment, PPP’s Tom Jensen wrote Jan. 12, according to an email from the anti-Amendment One campaign. “When PPP first polled on [the measure] in October, 61 percent of voters said they would support it.”

Despite the shift, Amendment One opponents regard the situation as urgent and have asked for help from all quarters. At a Human Rights Campaign event in Charlotte, on Feb. 26, Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius came out against Amendment One, adding, “I know there’s an important election in early May in North Carolina. ... And I think it’s a great template for what needs to be done to organize people and turn out people for November,” the Charlotte Observer reported.

Charlotte’s Democratic Mayor Anthony Foxx also criticized Amendment One, pledging to vote against it.

The Rev. Dr. William J. Barber II, President of the North Carolina NAACP, voiced strong opposition to Amendment One in a Sept. 9, 2011, “Open Letter to All North Carolinians.” “Our mission for 102 years has been to achieve equality of rights and eliminate prejudice among the people of the United States,” he wrote. “A vote on the same-sex marriage amendment has nothing to do with your personal opinion on same-sex marriage but everything to do with whether or not you believe discrimination should be codified and legalized constitutionally. ... No matter our color. No matter our faith tradition. Those who stand for love and justice are not about to fall for their trick. No matter how you feel personally about same-sex marriage, no one, especially those of us whose forebears were denied constitutional protections and counted as 3/5 of a vote for their slave-masters and mere chattel property for other purposes in the old Constitutions—none of us should ever want to deny any other person constitutional protections.”

While not expressly opposing Amendment One, Duke University, in a Feb. 17 press release, summarized its historical support of LGBT rights, concluding with the statement, “[W]e stand alongside the LGBT community in seeking a more equal world.”

Blogger Pam Spaulding, of Pam’s House Blend on Firedoglake, who works at Duke University, writes that this is a big deal. “As a member of the university’s staff, I have my wife Kate registered as a same-sex spousal equivalent. It is essential to have this benefit in our family because it provides a measure of security that Kate cannot [provide] for me—as a state employee, she not only cannot put me on her benefits package should I lose my job, but she can actually be fired for being gay. Yes, in 2012, we don’t have even have those basic protections or benefits at the state level.

“But I do at Duke, which is the largest employer in the area,” Spaulding continues, “as do many other residents of N.C. who are employed by private institutions and companies that have anti-discrimination policies and offer same-sex spousal equivalent benefits. The discussion about whether this is the right thing to do is over for these organizations. The fact that we have a retrograde legislature that is decades behind major employers and obsessed with restricting rights of LGBT North Carolinians is a depressing reality, and it manifests itself with Amendment One, which would permanently bar any legal relationship recognition of same-sex couples, and eliminate the domestic partnership ordinances that several municipalities and counties in the state currently have in place.”

The conservative Carolina Review came out against Amendment One in a Jan. 25 article entitled “Conservatives, Vote Against the N.C. Marriage Amendment,” reasoning that the measure “seems to threaten individual liberty, and exemplifies a government overstepping its bounds, which should trouble any conservative that prizes freedom and limited government.”

The battle against Amendment One remains decidedly uphill. Donations to help fight the measure may be made at the Protect ALL N.C. Families website, The site also enables people to volunteer remotely, as well as share their campaign video, Momentum.

 «  Return to previous page
 »  Send to a friend

Leave a comment:

showing all comments · Subscribe to comments
  1. liumeili posted on 08/31/2014 06:19 PM
    エミリオプッチ Emilio Pucciして今シーズン以降のためにあなたの外観に新しい要素を追加すミュウミュウ MIUMIU青いショルダーバッグを選択するように失敗します。シグネチャーロゴレタリングがチェックに文を保持します。私たちは、ミュウミュウのショルダーバッグの豊富な紫色を崇拝し、ひだマルベリー MULBERRYレザーは、単にきれいな仕上がりに追加されます。締結上のクリスタル装飾は、遊び心女性らしさのちょうど右の量と、それがさらにcovetableなります。マイケルコース MICHAEL KORSのミュウミュウのブランドジャガードアームカバーはパステルイエローのサテンのトリムで飾ら金の糸と織り台湾シリーズを、示している。これは、構築されたファスナーポケットやポーチはあなたの持ち物の秩序あるストレージ小片とすることができるであり、また、バリー BALLY取り外し可能なショルダーストラップの配置は、ショルダーバッグとして使用します。このパッケージのまばゆいは、もはや余分な目を引くのジュエリーを着用する必要はありません。アーニャハインドマーチ、このエレガントな「ジョージア」のクラッチ自宅のインテリアに触発タッセルで飾らデヴォンシャー公爵夫人という18世紀の社交界の美しさに、手でそれぞれのデザインは、バレンシアガ BALENCIAGA洗練8時間を要した。金でこのバッグは、複数のカードスロットやポケットにあなたのバーバリー BURBERRY 携帯電話用のジッパーとレザーテクスチャーポールスミス PAUL SMITH.
  2. sonadesjackson posted on 09/27/2014 08:23 PM
    A good watch can take between a short time to many months to generate. Even brands with sought after demand often cannot get enough product promote. This issue creates increased market interest including a bottleneck of production. Numerous brands would love to make more watches rather than they do fake cartier watches sale, but this isn't always easy or inexpensive. Having high demand is really a problem people aim for cheap tag heuer, and is due towards the time and complexity involved with making high-end timepieces. This is often related towards the concept that watches can be very expensive due to low construction and expensive suppliers fake tag heuer, which I discuss alot more below. Some high-end brands make ones own movements. Countless mainstream brands as well make their movements. But this is assessing very high-end mechanical ones with a reduced amount of expensive quartz movements. Building your own movements universally ensures that movement costs are planning to be comparatively cheaper - but mechanical movements are nevertheless expensive to make.
showing all comments